The ambiguous term trans rights still floats above the conversation, undefined and therefore attachable to anything no matter how surprising. Are parents sterilizing their children a trans right or a parental right? Is excluding girls from sports a trans right or a an elementary school administrative right? Are men exposing their genital…
The ambiguous term trans rights still floats above the conversation, undefined and therefore attachable to anything no matter how surprising. Are parents sterilizing their children a trans right or a parental right? Is excluding girls from sports a trans right or a an elementary school administrative right? Are men exposing their genitals in private facilities a trans right? Is falsifying legal documents a trans right? Trespass? Housing male rapists with women?
The right to appearance and choice of names is enshrined in law. Marriage? Whomever you love. Healthcare? It’s in the ACA, even insurance covered.
But you can’t compel thought, you can’t compel religion, you cant deny freedom of association, you can’t break trespass laws protecting sex privacy, you can’t break laws relating to discrimination, and you can’t redefine sex upon wish, compulsion, or need.
My husband & I had threesomes in our 20s (back when I was a stripper & he was still chasing music contracts) & although we personally did not involve the state in OUR relationship, believing marriage should only involve a couple & their family/community/church, with the state merely providing for legal protections of each individual & any offspring via civil union, we could never understand why anyone should care whether the state allows gays to get married. But when the zeitgeist became utterly obsessed with LGBTQIA+, we both naturally ended up re-examining the topic & ended up concluding that marriage is actually a "supernatural" merging of one male with one female & therefore requires an opposite-sex couple to accomplish. We still believe same-sex couples should enjoy all the same legal protections as married couples, we just no longer believe what they are doing falls within the definition of marriage. So congratulations, Globohomo, you've succeeded in convincing these two formerly degenerate (sex n drugs n rock n roll gets old when you're no longer young😂) lifelong classical libertines that gays CANNOT be married no matter how many court-sanctioned pieces of paper say so.
The ambiguous term trans rights still floats above the conversation, undefined and therefore attachable to anything no matter how surprising. Are parents sterilizing their children a trans right or a parental right? Is excluding girls from sports a trans right or a an elementary school administrative right? Are men exposing their genitals in private facilities a trans right? Is falsifying legal documents a trans right? Trespass? Housing male rapists with women?
The right to appearance and choice of names is enshrined in law. Marriage? Whomever you love. Healthcare? It’s in the ACA, even insurance covered.
But you can’t compel thought, you can’t compel religion, you cant deny freedom of association, you can’t break trespass laws protecting sex privacy, you can’t break laws relating to discrimination, and you can’t redefine sex upon wish, compulsion, or need.
My husband & I had threesomes in our 20s (back when I was a stripper & he was still chasing music contracts) & although we personally did not involve the state in OUR relationship, believing marriage should only involve a couple & their family/community/church, with the state merely providing for legal protections of each individual & any offspring via civil union, we could never understand why anyone should care whether the state allows gays to get married. But when the zeitgeist became utterly obsessed with LGBTQIA+, we both naturally ended up re-examining the topic & ended up concluding that marriage is actually a "supernatural" merging of one male with one female & therefore requires an opposite-sex couple to accomplish. We still believe same-sex couples should enjoy all the same legal protections as married couples, we just no longer believe what they are doing falls within the definition of marriage. So congratulations, Globohomo, you've succeeded in convincing these two formerly degenerate (sex n drugs n rock n roll gets old when you're no longer young😂) lifelong classical libertines that gays CANNOT be married no matter how many court-sanctioned pieces of paper say so.
?