My husband & I had threesomes in our 20s (back when I was a stripper & he was still chasing music contracts) & although we personally did not involve the state in OUR relationship, believing marriage should only involve a couple & their family/community/church, with the state merely providing for legal protections of each individual & an…
My husband & I had threesomes in our 20s (back when I was a stripper & he was still chasing music contracts) & although we personally did not involve the state in OUR relationship, believing marriage should only involve a couple & their family/community/church, with the state merely providing for legal protections of each individual & any offspring via civil union, we could never understand why anyone should care whether the state allows gays to get married. But when the zeitgeist became utterly obsessed with LGBTQIA+, we both naturally ended up re-examining the topic & ended up concluding that marriage is actually a "supernatural" merging of one male with one female & therefore requires an opposite-sex couple to accomplish. We still believe same-sex couples should enjoy all the same legal protections as married couples, we just no longer believe what they are doing falls within the definition of marriage. So congratulations, Globohomo, you've succeeded in convincing these two formerly degenerate (sex n drugs n rock n roll gets old when you're no longer young😂) lifelong classical libertines that gays CANNOT be married no matter how many court-sanctioned pieces of paper say so.
My husband & I had threesomes in our 20s (back when I was a stripper & he was still chasing music contracts) & although we personally did not involve the state in OUR relationship, believing marriage should only involve a couple & their family/community/church, with the state merely providing for legal protections of each individual & any offspring via civil union, we could never understand why anyone should care whether the state allows gays to get married. But when the zeitgeist became utterly obsessed with LGBTQIA+, we both naturally ended up re-examining the topic & ended up concluding that marriage is actually a "supernatural" merging of one male with one female & therefore requires an opposite-sex couple to accomplish. We still believe same-sex couples should enjoy all the same legal protections as married couples, we just no longer believe what they are doing falls within the definition of marriage. So congratulations, Globohomo, you've succeeded in convincing these two formerly degenerate (sex n drugs n rock n roll gets old when you're no longer young😂) lifelong classical libertines that gays CANNOT be married no matter how many court-sanctioned pieces of paper say so.
?