Clearly, we are living in a time where the over-reaching policies to protect the most ego-fragile humans ("unwanted advances", loose language, slips of the tongue) are differentially applied against productive people depending on whether they cross or adhere to any particular woke dogma. It's so Orwellian. Clear thinking, fair-minded peo…
Clearly, we are living in a time where the over-reaching policies to protect the most ego-fragile humans ("unwanted advances", loose language, slips of the tongue) are differentially applied against productive people depending on whether they cross or adhere to any particular woke dogma. It's so Orwellian. Clear thinking, fair-minded people need to call out these Stasi tactics at every opportunity; there is so much to lose by remaining passive!
No, this is ridiculous. This article doesn't even say what he did!! Why not? Tell me what he did, and then I'll make up my mind. So vague, basically pointless. How are people out here calling themselves intrepid journalists, but they can't even provide facts? Do you fucking jobs.
Inadequate response, in my opinion. The article lacks even a summary that would justify the conclusions reached, beginning with "inadvertently." That word was jarringly out of place without anything in the article itself to support it. Evidently I am not alone in wishing the article to meet minimum informational standards without needing to follow one or more supporting references.
Thanks for reading. The article was intended to encourage readers to view the movie and introduce them to Fryer’s work. Rob Montz did an outstanding job with the evidence. Check it out!
Clearly, we are living in a time where the over-reaching policies to protect the most ego-fragile humans ("unwanted advances", loose language, slips of the tongue) are differentially applied against productive people depending on whether they cross or adhere to any particular woke dogma. It's so Orwellian. Clear thinking, fair-minded people need to call out these Stasi tactics at every opportunity; there is so much to lose by remaining passive!
No, this is ridiculous. This article doesn't even say what he did!! Why not? Tell me what he did, and then I'll make up my mind. So vague, basically pointless. How are people out here calling themselves intrepid journalists, but they can't even provide facts? Do you fucking jobs.
Thanks for reading. The movie is linked in the article and has the information you are looking for.
Inadequate response, in my opinion. The article lacks even a summary that would justify the conclusions reached, beginning with "inadvertently." That word was jarringly out of place without anything in the article itself to support it. Evidently I am not alone in wishing the article to meet minimum informational standards without needing to follow one or more supporting references.
Hi Bill,
Thanks for reading. The article was intended to encourage readers to view the movie and introduce them to Fryer’s work. Rob Montz did an outstanding job with the evidence. Check it out!
Best-