Inadequate response, in my opinion. The article lacks even a summary that would justify the conclusions reached, beginning with "inadvertently." That word was jarringly out of place without anything in the article itself to support it. Evidently I am not alone in wishing the article to meet minimum informational standards without needing to follow one or more supporting references.
Inadequate response, in my opinion. The article lacks even a summary that would justify the conclusions reached, beginning with "inadvertently." That word was jarringly out of place without anything in the article itself to support it. Evidently I am not alone in wishing the article to meet minimum informational standards without needing to follow one or more supporting references.
Thanks for reading. The article was intended to encourage readers to view the movie and introduce them to Fryer’s work. Rob Montz did an outstanding job with the evidence. Check it out!
Inadequate response, in my opinion. The article lacks even a summary that would justify the conclusions reached, beginning with "inadvertently." That word was jarringly out of place without anything in the article itself to support it. Evidently I am not alone in wishing the article to meet minimum informational standards without needing to follow one or more supporting references.
Hi Bill,
Thanks for reading. The article was intended to encourage readers to view the movie and introduce them to Fryer’s work. Rob Montz did an outstanding job with the evidence. Check it out!
Best-