This is a moronic piece of cluelessness. I love the beginning, looking for deep intellectual meaning, but you failed within the first comparison. Alito and SCOTUS did not provide mercy -- they provided noting other than the rule of law. Your weak comparison is amateurish at worst, naive at best. No rights were stripped, only a bad decisi…
This is a moronic piece of cluelessness. I love the beginning, looking for deep intellectual meaning, but you failed within the first comparison. Alito and SCOTUS did not provide mercy -- they provided noting other than the rule of law. Your weak comparison is amateurish at worst, naive at best. No rights were stripped, only a bad decision removed from the history books, delivered to the States and We The People as the law requires to make a decision on this gravely important matter. Of course this does not fit into your brilliants but lacking presentation of a great play comparator. You are better than that... especially considering your writing skills are fantastic.
Ms. Penny, Your comment is vapid and grossly assumptive. Making a character challenge from my comment means you're void of the understanding of my comment. As a society, we all must show more grace and give mercy to those in need, and I lead the way in these two virtues. However, the story that you reference highlights the laziness of the writers ability to use a story line that has zero (not hyperbole) to do with what SCOTUS ruling--a ruling in the law, not in someones feelings. SCOTUS has a job to rule solely based on the merits of the law. They ruled the original ruling, per RBG was wholly flawed and needed to be returned to the States. I hope my demonstration of showing you grace will intern give you hope there is grace and mercy in this world-- and that you should truly dig deeper to understand someone's comment and avoid jumping in with the loud, clueless keyboard cowboys of our society and be a knowledgable guiding light. Remember, snide comments are the lowest form of wit. All the best, B
This is a moronic piece of cluelessness. I love the beginning, looking for deep intellectual meaning, but you failed within the first comparison. Alito and SCOTUS did not provide mercy -- they provided noting other than the rule of law. Your weak comparison is amateurish at worst, naive at best. No rights were stripped, only a bad decision removed from the history books, delivered to the States and We The People as the law requires to make a decision on this gravely important matter. Of course this does not fit into your brilliants but lacking presentation of a great play comparator. You are better than that... especially considering your writing skills are fantastic.
Thank you. With titles like this I read the comments first.
So I don’t have to waist my time reading the article.
You have it 1000% correct on the law.
Ms. Penny, Your comment is vapid and grossly assumptive. Making a character challenge from my comment means you're void of the understanding of my comment. As a society, we all must show more grace and give mercy to those in need, and I lead the way in these two virtues. However, the story that you reference highlights the laziness of the writers ability to use a story line that has zero (not hyperbole) to do with what SCOTUS ruling--a ruling in the law, not in someones feelings. SCOTUS has a job to rule solely based on the merits of the law. They ruled the original ruling, per RBG was wholly flawed and needed to be returned to the States. I hope my demonstration of showing you grace will intern give you hope there is grace and mercy in this world-- and that you should truly dig deeper to understand someone's comment and avoid jumping in with the loud, clueless keyboard cowboys of our society and be a knowledgable guiding light. Remember, snide comments are the lowest form of wit. All the best, B