Ms. Penny, Your comment is vapid and grossly assumptive. Making a character challenge from my comment means you're void of the understanding of my comment. As a society, we all must show more grace and give mercy to those in need, and I lead the way in these two virtues. However, the story that you reference highlights the laziness of the writers ability to use a story line that has zero (not hyperbole) to do with what SCOTUS ruling--a ruling in the law, not in someones feelings. SCOTUS has a job to rule solely based on the merits of the law. They ruled the original ruling, per RBG was wholly flawed and needed to be returned to the States. I hope my demonstration of showing you grace will intern give you hope there is grace and mercy in this world-- and that you should truly dig deeper to understand someone's comment and avoid jumping in with the loud, clueless keyboard cowboys of our society and be a knowledgable guiding light. Remember, snide comments are the lowest form of wit. All the best, B
Ms. Penny, Your comment is vapid and grossly assumptive. Making a character challenge from my comment means you're void of the understanding of my comment. As a society, we all must show more grace and give mercy to those in need, and I lead the way in these two virtues. However, the story that you reference highlights the laziness of the writers ability to use a story line that has zero (not hyperbole) to do with what SCOTUS ruling--a ruling in the law, not in someones feelings. SCOTUS has a job to rule solely based on the merits of the law. They ruled the original ruling, per RBG was wholly flawed and needed to be returned to the States. I hope my demonstration of showing you grace will intern give you hope there is grace and mercy in this world-- and that you should truly dig deeper to understand someone's comment and avoid jumping in with the loud, clueless keyboard cowboys of our society and be a knowledgable guiding light. Remember, snide comments are the lowest form of wit. All the best, B