He never mentions colorblindness. He merely makes the pro-human case championed by FAIR. Seeing past race (or other immutable characteristics) and valuing the individual. Hard to see much wrong with that approach.
He never mentions colorblindness. He merely makes the pro-human case championed by FAIR. Seeing past race (or other immutable characteristics) and valuing the individual. Hard to see much wrong with that approach.
I think it is a great goal to have. However, I don't think we ever get there by turning a blind eye to how this country has and still does use race as a way to demean other human beings. Its a nice idea to suggest that we should all just move on without honestly confronting it, but I think that is unrealistic and a dismissive approach that will never achieve the racial reconciliation that we so badly need in this country.
He never mentions colorblindness. He merely makes the pro-human case championed by FAIR. Seeing past race (or other immutable characteristics) and valuing the individual. Hard to see much wrong with that approach.
I think it is a great goal to have. However, I don't think we ever get there by turning a blind eye to how this country has and still does use race as a way to demean other human beings. Its a nice idea to suggest that we should all just move on without honestly confronting it, but I think that is unrealistic and a dismissive approach that will never achieve the racial reconciliation that we so badly need in this country.