LOL you are attempting to disagree with a person who actually shares your perspective on informed consent, is against immediate capitulation by both parents & medical establishments, and who also sees "Give me what I want or I'll kill myself" as a symptom of a pathology.
I actually did not say he wants trans folks dead; it is sophistry on…
LOL you are attempting to disagree with a person who actually shares your perspective on informed consent, is against immediate capitulation by both parents & medical establishments, and who also sees "Give me what I want or I'll kill myself" as a symptom of a pathology.
I actually did not say he wants trans folks dead; it is sophistry on your part to put words in my mouth. Try not to do that in the future, it is an ineffective tactic. Although certainly a popular one, at least on Twitter.
I wrote that he "would prefer that they not exist as they do today" which does not have the same meaning as DEAD. I personally don't believe that Walsh wants them dead either.
My comment is not hyperbole because, if you followed the links, you'd see that Walsh wants surgical options to be illegal FOR ALL AGES, not just children. Please read his words for yourself, they are pretty straightforward. If Walsh called the shots, my friends & colleagues would not - as I specifically wrote - "exist as they do today." They would not be the same people physically because they would have been unable to have surgery. They would be in the same bodies that caused them so much suffering earlier in their lives... "not exist as they do today" does not equal "dead".
The next time you consider posting a rebuttal, I advise that you read the post you are attempting to bash a bit more closely. Also, perhaps follow links that include a person's exact words. And finally, accusing someone of "sophistry" is not polite disagreement, it is a deep insult and therefore an attack.
LOL you are attempting to disagree with a person who actually shares your perspective on informed consent, is against immediate capitulation by both parents & medical establishments, and who also sees "Give me what I want or I'll kill myself" as a symptom of a pathology.
I actually did not say he wants trans folks dead; it is sophistry on your part to put words in my mouth. Try not to do that in the future, it is an ineffective tactic. Although certainly a popular one, at least on Twitter.
I wrote that he "would prefer that they not exist as they do today" which does not have the same meaning as DEAD. I personally don't believe that Walsh wants them dead either.
My comment is not hyperbole because, if you followed the links, you'd see that Walsh wants surgical options to be illegal FOR ALL AGES, not just children. Please read his words for yourself, they are pretty straightforward. If Walsh called the shots, my friends & colleagues would not - as I specifically wrote - "exist as they do today." They would not be the same people physically because they would have been unable to have surgery. They would be in the same bodies that caused them so much suffering earlier in their lives... "not exist as they do today" does not equal "dead".
The next time you consider posting a rebuttal, I advise that you read the post you are attempting to bash a bit more closely. Also, perhaps follow links that include a person's exact words. And finally, accusing someone of "sophistry" is not polite disagreement, it is a deep insult and therefore an attack.
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/sophistry
Cheers!
Such a scold...your blandishments about my behavior are disregarded in light of the fact that you edited your post so you could make this point.