Best wishes for you and your lawsuit against them. Thank you for having the endurance and courage to fight back. So many people in your position have just walked away.
Best wishes for you and your lawsuit against them. Thank you for having the endurance and courage to fight back. So many people in your position have just walked away.
You mean… they have “turned the other cheek”? As much as I sympathize with her efforts to fight — particularly against libel if it occurred — it’s a contradiction of common Christian ethics. At least superficially—Christian ethics are hypocritical, but one side of it is “forgiveness” and “loving your enemy”. That is not compatible with fighting. Fighting isn’t for the “meek”.
The fact that “so many people” in her “position have just walked away” is not surprising given they plausibly embrace a morality of masochistic autophagic self-abasement, which Jesus and Paul preached.
They have stolen the religion, pretending virtue while engaging in vice. The point is not to punish but to discourage continuing wrong doing. Also to get my reputation and livelihood restored. Christian ethics don't encourage allowing bullies to retain their power to wound.
Jumping into a thread about people grieving the takeover of their church, in order to troll Christian philosophy, is the work of a troll. Are you a troll?
Have some decency and self-respect and go away, please.
"Any attempt to challenge someone else’s ideas is now frequently met not with evidence or reasoned defense, but by labeling the challenge (and often the challenger) as racist, ableist, transphobic, and the like. "
Try something more than just labeling me a troll[quite "dehumanizing" of you!] without any evidence. If you want to actually debate anything, I would have no reservations. Your comment is exactly a reflection of the behaviors of the people who she is suing.
A good response for people in the UU church who don't like the infiltration of "gender woo" (your words) is to start a new tribe that actually has good standards with regard to "reason". The bible, and other major religious texts, are some of the most irrational works of literature created by humanity. To declare them "sacred", and to revere them, and then get upset that "woo" is taking over is ridiculous. I have enough "self-respect" and "decency" not to apologize for a book of torture and slavery while simultaneously being outraged by people who want to police our pronouns.
Incoherent and self-destructive notions of "tolerance" and "equality" are the "liberal values" of UU that ultimately allowed it to be poisoned by the gender fascists.
But as I said, I sympathize with her fight, particularly if libel is involved.
If you can't handle my opinion, you go away. I'm not going anywhere.
Best wishes for you and your lawsuit against them. Thank you for having the endurance and courage to fight back. So many people in your position have just walked away.
You mean… they have “turned the other cheek”? As much as I sympathize with her efforts to fight — particularly against libel if it occurred — it’s a contradiction of common Christian ethics. At least superficially—Christian ethics are hypocritical, but one side of it is “forgiveness” and “loving your enemy”. That is not compatible with fighting. Fighting isn’t for the “meek”.
The fact that “so many people” in her “position have just walked away” is not surprising given they plausibly embrace a morality of masochistic autophagic self-abasement, which Jesus and Paul preached.
They have stolen the religion, pretending virtue while engaging in vice. The point is not to punish but to discourage continuing wrong doing. Also to get my reputation and livelihood restored. Christian ethics don't encourage allowing bullies to retain their power to wound.
UU isn't just Christian, and thus it didn't have to follow a christian ethics analysis. If anything it was more Deist.
Yah, as of now it is quite incoherent nonsense.
No disagreement there.
Oops, you're in the wrong forum. Trolling Christians is that way --------------->>
Your understanding of Christianity seems inspired by LaVey rather than any actual Christian teachings.
lol Lavey.
Let me guess, you have actually not read the Bible?
Jumping into a thread about people grieving the takeover of their church, in order to troll Christian philosophy, is the work of a troll. Are you a troll?
Have some decency and self-respect and go away, please.
"Any attempt to challenge someone else’s ideas is now frequently met not with evidence or reasoned defense, but by labeling the challenge (and often the challenger) as racist, ableist, transphobic, and the like. "
Try something more than just labeling me a troll[quite "dehumanizing" of you!] without any evidence. If you want to actually debate anything, I would have no reservations. Your comment is exactly a reflection of the behaviors of the people who she is suing.
A good response for people in the UU church who don't like the infiltration of "gender woo" (your words) is to start a new tribe that actually has good standards with regard to "reason". The bible, and other major religious texts, are some of the most irrational works of literature created by humanity. To declare them "sacred", and to revere them, and then get upset that "woo" is taking over is ridiculous. I have enough "self-respect" and "decency" not to apologize for a book of torture and slavery while simultaneously being outraged by people who want to police our pronouns.
Incoherent and self-destructive notions of "tolerance" and "equality" are the "liberal values" of UU that ultimately allowed it to be poisoned by the gender fascists.
But as I said, I sympathize with her fight, particularly if libel is involved.
If you can't handle my opinion, you go away. I'm not going anywhere.
"I'm not a troll!"
(Proceeds to troll some more)
Bye! -------------------------------->>>>
You are projecting.