As usual, I am deeply jealous of your ability to assemble a broad range of facts and present them elegantly. And of course, any article that quotes Chesterton automatically goes to the head of the class. Well done. But will those marching in the streets and chanting “from the river to the sea” ever read Chesterton, or this wonderful explication of equitism?
As usual, I am deeply jealous of your ability to assemble a broad range of facts and present them elegantly. And of course, any article that quotes Chesterton automatically goes to the head of the class. Well done. But will those marching in the streets and chanting “from the river to the sea” ever read Chesterton, or this wonderful explication of equitism?
Thanks, Mark. If one of those marchers reads this and rethinks, then it's worth it. But I'm not really writing for the river-to-the-sea marchers. Writing for people in the middle, who listen to facts, and who are capable of persuasion. The correspondence I get suggests that there are quite a few of them.
As usual, I am deeply jealous of your ability to assemble a broad range of facts and present them elegantly. And of course, any article that quotes Chesterton automatically goes to the head of the class. Well done. But will those marching in the streets and chanting “from the river to the sea” ever read Chesterton, or this wonderful explication of equitism?
Thanks, Mark. If one of those marchers reads this and rethinks, then it's worth it. But I'm not really writing for the river-to-the-sea marchers. Writing for people in the middle, who listen to facts, and who are capable of persuasion. The correspondence I get suggests that there are quite a few of them.