Caveat: being created in the image and likeness of God (Gn 1:26-27), all humans share the same divine dignity. Under God, no race has more dignity than another. The only thing that counts on judgement day, is how much each person loved, each minute, God and neighbor. God wants all men from all peoples to be saved (Is 2:1-5; Rev 5:9; Ps 2…
Caveat: being created in the image and likeness of God (Gn 1:26-27), all humans share the same divine dignity. Under God, no race has more dignity than another. The only thing that counts on judgement day, is how much each person loved, each minute, God and neighbor. God wants all men from all peoples to be saved (Is 2:1-5; Rev 5:9; Ps 2:8). Skin pigment has zero value in face of eternal bliss or damnation, yet racial hate, as any hate, is a turnpike to hell. There’s no room for hatred in heaven. Heaven is being with God. God is perfect love (1 Jn 4:7-12). He’s incompatible with the slightest hate: the desire of evil to others, means being enchained to evil, Satan.
Masons have coined “the white man’s burden” now reloaded as “White privilege”: “an invisible package of unearned assets that I can count on cashing in each day, but about which I was “meant” to remain oblivious. White privilege is like an invisible weightless knapsack of special provisions, maps, passports, codebooks, visas, clothes, tools , and blank checks” (McIntosh, 1988).
It assumes the privilege is undeserved without any proof. Proving that it is deserved, indirectly means that other races fairly deserve less, thus, the proof becomes racist in itself. Catch 22. It’s a circular argument. The only way to prove its falsity is that Asians have thrived in the US in only 1 generation, while non-whites didn’t. This shows that there’s no privilege and no barrier, except hard work and a frugal living!
Median weekly earnings of full-time wage and salary workers
Why is it that no one speaks of "Asian privilege" in the USA, where they get richer than whites? Because it proves that there is are no systematic "privileges" except hard work.
There's no such thing as "white privilege", just the privilege of belonging to generations of hard work, frugality, saving and wise-investing. The term “white privilege” was coined by the cabal, to destroy the only thing standing in their way:
a) the creativity (check patents by race/countries)
b) the love of freedom, so much as to be willing to give life for it (even using the right to bear arms)
c) Christian martyr-ethos (so far, no other race embraced that ideal as much)
Why is it that no one speaks of proven “mason privilege” ... now that's a mind opener!
Asians have the highest full time earnings: why isn’t anybody speaking of Asian privilege? Because this is a war on whites, especially, male.
The same crazy argument could turn into anti-judaism, considering the percentage of Jews in the top income tier. Or, for that sake, anti-armenians, anti-turks, etc., since those ‘categories’ also thrive in the US above average whites and non-whites.
Why is it that the term “white women privilege” is censoed even among the transectionalists? The cabal needs to destroy all families, not just white, with the false argument that all women are exploited by men, presumed to be guilty of male-chauvinism and a rape-mentality.
If there are any differences it’s because of productivity and individual free choices.
Capitalist competition for profits doesn’t allow discrimination: discriminating talent means losing market share, economies of scale, profits and eventually bankruptcy against the non-discriminating competition. All that matters is productivity!
Earnings show a difference between men and women because they don’t take into account, earnings divided by total hours worked. They deliberately mix full-time wages, without considering part-time jobs and hourly pay, mostly a free choice of part-time mothers and female university students, who are the majority in universities (women’s privilege, another censored truth). The glass ceiling myth hides the hours worked myth!
Another censored counter-argument is the so called “white-trash”. Poor whites prove that poverty doesn’t discriminate the white race and that family support is essential to the thriving of all children: there’s never equality of opportunity if you lack a father. Instead of asking the skin color, social researchers should focus on the destruction of the family.
Privilege ideology tries to avoid that rebuttal by an irrational explanation which is actually a counter argument: “Non-whites who have are of a higher social class than whites would also receive different treatment. Sullivan states that the revised concept of ‘white class privilege’ must be used intersectionally—that is, privilege must be considered interacting with class, gender, national, and other social experiences. Sure, lower-class whites may be treated differently than higher-class blacks in certain contexts, but this does not mean that the lower-class white has ‘more privilege’ than the upper-class black. This shows that we should not assume that lower-class whites have the same kinds of privilege conferred by society as middle- and upper-class whites.” 1
Their conclusion: if a non-white gets rich, he deserves it, but if a white works hard to get rich, it is an unearned privilege, and vice-versa, a lazy non-white doesn’t deserve to be poor because he is underprivileged, while a working white, does deserve poverty because he still has the privilege of being a white poor !!!
“The straight white male is both the provider and the eternal perpetrator. All the problems of the world are ultimately his fault. Whatever he’s accomplished is due to privilege, and whatever he’s done wrong has no excuse.” 2 “In the same way we seem determined to define sex as inherently predatory — “extractive”, with sexual participants divided into takers and survivors — we’re defining political reality as violent by nature, a world of repressors and victims.” 3
Also, this ideology assumes that all whites are racists, even subconsciously: conveniently, that can never be disproven! Even if the white is a relative, friend or fiancée, any white is presumed a subconscious biggot. The most unbelievable case happened in Las Vegas where a student with African ascent was classified as a white-privileged black, just because one of his parents was white, and was sanctioned by the school for questioning Critical race theory4, stating that being black he was presumed to be a racist against other blacks.
White privilege is presumed even in countries without whites: the privilege belongs to the European and North American countries exploiting the poor nation.
Caveat: being created in the image and likeness of God (Gn 1:26-27), all humans share the same divine dignity. Under God, no race has more dignity than another. The only thing that counts on judgement day, is how much each person loved, each minute, God and neighbor. God wants all men from all peoples to be saved (Is 2:1-5; Rev 5:9; Ps 2:8). Skin pigment has zero value in face of eternal bliss or damnation, yet racial hate, as any hate, is a turnpike to hell. There’s no room for hatred in heaven. Heaven is being with God. God is perfect love (1 Jn 4:7-12). He’s incompatible with the slightest hate: the desire of evil to others, means being enchained to evil, Satan.
Masons have coined “the white man’s burden” now reloaded as “White privilege”: “an invisible package of unearned assets that I can count on cashing in each day, but about which I was “meant” to remain oblivious. White privilege is like an invisible weightless knapsack of special provisions, maps, passports, codebooks, visas, clothes, tools , and blank checks” (McIntosh, 1988).
It assumes the privilege is undeserved without any proof. Proving that it is deserved, indirectly means that other races fairly deserve less, thus, the proof becomes racist in itself. Catch 22. It’s a circular argument. The only way to prove its falsity is that Asians have thrived in the US in only 1 generation, while non-whites didn’t. This shows that there’s no privilege and no barrier, except hard work and a frugal living!
Median weekly earnings of full-time wage and salary workers
by sex, race, and ethnicity, U.S., 2009.[
http://www.bls.gov/cps/cpswom2009.pdf
Why is it that no one speaks of "Asian privilege" in the USA, where they get richer than whites? Because it proves that there is are no systematic "privileges" except hard work.
There's no such thing as "white privilege", just the privilege of belonging to generations of hard work, frugality, saving and wise-investing. The term “white privilege” was coined by the cabal, to destroy the only thing standing in their way:
a) the creativity (check patents by race/countries)
b) the love of freedom, so much as to be willing to give life for it (even using the right to bear arms)
c) Christian martyr-ethos (so far, no other race embraced that ideal as much)
Why is it that no one speaks of proven “mason privilege” ... now that's a mind opener!
Asians have the highest full time earnings: why isn’t anybody speaking of Asian privilege? Because this is a war on whites, especially, male.
The same crazy argument could turn into anti-judaism, considering the percentage of Jews in the top income tier. Or, for that sake, anti-armenians, anti-turks, etc., since those ‘categories’ also thrive in the US above average whites and non-whites.
Why is it that the term “white women privilege” is censoed even among the transectionalists? The cabal needs to destroy all families, not just white, with the false argument that all women are exploited by men, presumed to be guilty of male-chauvinism and a rape-mentality.
If there are any differences it’s because of productivity and individual free choices.
Capitalist competition for profits doesn’t allow discrimination: discriminating talent means losing market share, economies of scale, profits and eventually bankruptcy against the non-discriminating competition. All that matters is productivity!
Earnings show a difference between men and women because they don’t take into account, earnings divided by total hours worked. They deliberately mix full-time wages, without considering part-time jobs and hourly pay, mostly a free choice of part-time mothers and female university students, who are the majority in universities (women’s privilege, another censored truth). The glass ceiling myth hides the hours worked myth!
Another censored counter-argument is the so called “white-trash”. Poor whites prove that poverty doesn’t discriminate the white race and that family support is essential to the thriving of all children: there’s never equality of opportunity if you lack a father. Instead of asking the skin color, social researchers should focus on the destruction of the family.
Privilege ideology tries to avoid that rebuttal by an irrational explanation which is actually a counter argument: “Non-whites who have are of a higher social class than whites would also receive different treatment. Sullivan states that the revised concept of ‘white class privilege’ must be used intersectionally—that is, privilege must be considered interacting with class, gender, national, and other social experiences. Sure, lower-class whites may be treated differently than higher-class blacks in certain contexts, but this does not mean that the lower-class white has ‘more privilege’ than the upper-class black. This shows that we should not assume that lower-class whites have the same kinds of privilege conferred by society as middle- and upper-class whites.” 1
Their conclusion: if a non-white gets rich, he deserves it, but if a white works hard to get rich, it is an unearned privilege, and vice-versa, a lazy non-white doesn’t deserve to be poor because he is underprivileged, while a working white, does deserve poverty because he still has the privilege of being a white poor !!!
“The straight white male is both the provider and the eternal perpetrator. All the problems of the world are ultimately his fault. Whatever he’s accomplished is due to privilege, and whatever he’s done wrong has no excuse.” 2 “In the same way we seem determined to define sex as inherently predatory — “extractive”, with sexual participants divided into takers and survivors — we’re defining political reality as violent by nature, a world of repressors and victims.” 3
Also, this ideology assumes that all whites are racists, even subconsciously: conveniently, that can never be disproven! Even if the white is a relative, friend or fiancée, any white is presumed a subconscious biggot. The most unbelievable case happened in Las Vegas where a student with African ascent was classified as a white-privileged black, just because one of his parents was white, and was sanctioned by the school for questioning Critical race theory4, stating that being black he was presumed to be a racist against other blacks.
White privilege is presumed even in countries without whites: the privilege belongs to the European and North American countries exploiting the poor nation.