Reclaiming Adolescent Resilience—Beyond the Chemical Solution

Part 3 of our 3-part investigation into the dangers of SSRIs for adolescents

FAIR in Medicine is dedicated to supporting the scientific method, viewpoint diversity, and rigorous inquiry in the search for objective truth. We believe that intolerance is the enemy of free and open inquiry and respectful scientific debate. FAIR's advocacy for the rights of biological women and girls in sports and other protected spaces is premised on the need for objective scientific truth, but we also recognize the need to advocate for rigorous scientific inquiry beyond issues relating to gender. As part of this effort, FAIR has launched a three-part series to examine the benefits, risks, and impact of antidepressants. In the future, we will explore other areas in which scientific debate and inquiry have been stifled by intolerance to the detriment of doctors and patients.

In Parts 1 and 2 of our investigation, we exposed how SSRIs have become the default response to adolescent distress, despite questionable efficacy and serious risks. We've examined the lack of thorough investigation and inadequate science behind their approval as well as the potential for these drugs to permanently alter adolescent development.

Now we turn to the most important question: What's the alternative? How can we support struggling adolescents without resorting to drugs that may cause more harm than good?

The Disease-Mongering of Normal Development

The medicalization of teenage life represents one of modern medicine's most troubling developments. Normal adolescent experiences—mood fluctuations, identity exploration, social anxieties, academic stress—are now routinely pathologized and treated as disorders requiring pharmaceutical intervention.

Today's diagnostic thresholds have plummeted. Two weeks of post-breakup sadness can trigger a Major Depressive Disorder diagnosis. Normal social nervousness becomes an anxiety disorder. Compounding this problem, flawed screening tools like the PHQ-9-A are now mandated in pediatricians' offices. These instruments reduce complex emotions to checklists, funneling teenagers into medication pipelines.

The fear-based narrative around teen mental health has created a crisis mentality among parents and practitioners alike. The tragic irony: in our desperate attempt to prevent suicide, we're prescribing drugs that carry the FDA's most serious safety alert—a black box warning explicitly stating SSRIs can increase suicidal thoughts and behaviors in young people. Yet we continue this dangerous experiment under the banner of "helping."

Emotions as Signals, Not Symptoms

Perhaps the most destructive aspect of the chemical imbalance narrative is how it reframes emotions as malfunctions rather than meaningful signals. This pervasive notion has seeped into popular culture, shaping our language and attitudes towards mental health. Phrases like “chemical imbalance” are now commonplace, echoed in movies, social media, and even educational environments, reinforcing the false belief that emotional struggles are purely pathological phenomena that require pharmacological fixes. Adolescent distress points to legitimate problems demanding attention and support—academic pressure, social challenges, family dynamics, sleep deprivation, or nutritional deficiencies.

When we prescribe drugs that induce emotional blunting, we deprive teenagers of crucial opportunities to develop emotional intelligence and coping skills. While the emotions we label as depression and anxiety may be painful, they serve important adaptive functions. They alert us to circumstances that require change, boundaries that need enforcement, or needs that are going unmet, yet this truth remains obscured by oversimplified narratives.

By teaching adolescents to view their emotions as mere chemical errors rather than rich information that can guide them, we undermine their developing sense of agency and self-efficacy. The implicit message becomes clear: “You cannot trust your feelings; your brain is broken; only external chemical solutions can fix you.” This detrimental mindset not only dismisses the validity of emotional experiences but also fosters a culture of dependency on medications.

It is imperative that we cultivate a more empowering approach—one that acknowledges emotional pain while recognizing its potential value. By reframing the conversation, we challenge the popular narratives that dominate our discourse. Rather than asking, “What medication will stop this feeling?” we might pose the more constructive question - “What is this feeling telling us?” This perspective shift transforms the adolescent from a passive patient to an active participant in their own emotional development, emphasizing the episodic nature of struggle as a shared human experience rather than a solitary affliction.

The Power of Watchful Waiting in Primary Care

Primary care providers face immense pressure to "do something" when confronted with a distressed teenager. Yet for most adolescents experiencing emotional struggles, time, validation and support—not medication—provide the path to resolution.

Studies indicate that over half of young people with symptoms of depression and/or anxiety tend to achieve recovery within a year, when they do not receive specific mental health treatment. Such a process can be understood as a sign of resilience with young people bouncing back from their experience of distress. Many instances of adolescent distress are associated with current life stressors that can resolve over time.

Primary care physicians can support active problem-solving and normalize struggles by fostering open discussions about challenges, emphasizing that it is common for adolescents to face difficulties. A recent study suggests that watchful waiting may be especially effective when coupled with depathologization, psychosocial advice, and shared decision-making.This approach should be explored as a first-line treatment for non-suicidal patients exhibiting depressive symptoms, empowering adolescents while minimizing unnecessary medicalization.

Addressing the Screen-Mental Health Connection

Perhaps no factor has more profoundly impacted adolescent mental health than the smartphone revolution. Today's teenagers spend 7-9 hours daily on screens—more time than they spend in school, with family, or sleeping. Each additional hour of daily screen use increases depression risk by approximately 8%.

Social psychologist Jonathan Haidt, in his book "The Anxious Generation," proposes four evidence-based recommendations to improve teen mental health:

1. No smartphones before high school: Restrict children to basic communication devices until 9th grade.

2. No social media before age 16: Delay exposure until adolescents develop more secure identities.

3. Phone-free schools: Store devices during the school day to promote genuine interaction.

4. More free play and independence: Counterbalance digital immersion with real-world social experiences.

Yet our medical response ignores this environmental factor. We prescribe SSRIs while allowing the triggers—digital stimulation, social comparison, cyberbullying, and sleep disruption—to continue unabated. Reasonable limits like phone-free meals, no phones in bedrooms overnight, and designated tech-free times create space for face-to-face interaction crucial for adolescent development.

Sleep: The Non-Negotiable Foundation

No discussion of adolescent mental health is complete without addressing sleep. Today's teenagers sleep approximately one hour less per night than their counterparts in the 1980s—a deficit with profound implications for emotional regulation, cognitive function, and stress resilience.

According to the Common Sense Media report, which surveyed 1,000 parents and their children, 68% of teens admit to bringing their devices into bed, with nearly a third of them falling asleep while their phones are still with them. The study found that 36% of teens wake up and check their mobile device at least once a night for a reason other than checking the time. Of those teens, a little more than half say it's because they received a notification or they just wanted to look at social media.

Sleep deprivation mimics the symptoms of depression and anxiety with remarkable precision: irritability, concentration problems, emotional reactivity, negative thought patterns, and reduced stress tolerance. When we medicate these symptoms without addressing their cause, we mask rather than resolve the underlying problem.

Simple interventions include consistent sleep-wake schedules (even on weekends), electronic curfews (no screens 1-2 hours before bedtime), and sleep-friendly bedroom environments (dark, cool, quiet).

Schools can contribute by adjusting start times to align with adolescent circadian rhythms, which naturally shift toward later sleep and wake times during puberty. Districts that have implemented later start times report reduced depression rates, improved academic performance, and fewer behavioral problems.

Movement and Nutrition: The Physical Foundations of Mental Health

Physical movement and proper nutrition are essential for treating and preventing depression, with the emerging fields of nutritional and metabolic psychiatry increasingly recognizing their profound impact on brain health and emotional well-being.

Regular exercise—whether structured sports or simple walking—increases brain-derived neurotrophic factor supporting neuroplasticity, boosts mood-elevating endorphins, reduces inflammation, and improves sleep quality. The prescription is straightforward: 30-60 minutes of daily movement, preferably outdoors and with others. Unlike SSRIs, exercise carries no black box warning and builds rather than undermines resilience.

Similarly, the modern processed food diet creates ideal conditions for mood dysregulation. Diets rich in omega-3 fatty acids, antioxidants, and whole foods reduce depression risk by approximately 30%, while highly processed foods, refined sugars, and inflammatory oils increase it. Common nutritional deficiencies in adolescents—vitamin D, omega-3s, B vitamins, zinc, and magnesium—directly impact mood regulation. Addressing these through nutrient-dense foods often produces substantial mood improvements.

Facing Fears to Overcome Them

Anxiety disorders are affecting approximately 1 in 12 children and 1 in 4 adolescents. While SSRIs are routinely prescribed for these conditions, the most effective evidence-based treatment takes a fundamentally different approach: controlled exposure to fear-inducing situations.

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy with exposure interventions consistently outperforms medication for anxiety disorders, delivering longer-lasting results without the adverse reactions, dependency risks, or withdrawal symptoms associated with pharmaceutical interventions.The mechanism is straightforward but powerful: systematic, graduated exposure to feared situations teaches the brain that: (1) feared outcomes rarely materialize; (2) anxiety naturally diminishes with time; and (3) coping skills can manage discomfort when it arises.

This approach stands in stark contrast to the medication model, which implicitly teaches adolescents that anxiety requires chemical management and that avoidance rather than engagement represents the path to relief. By facing rather than avoiding fears, teenagers develop resilience that serves them throughout life. Common sense approaches that use psychotherapy to identify and address the problems influencing and maintaining depressive or anxiety symptoms are critical. This includes family therapies and problem solving interventions.

Hormonal Contraception: A Hidden Driver of Adolescent Distress

Hormonal birth control, commonly prescribed to teenagers for acne, irregular periods, and contraception, may significantly alter brain development and mood regulation. Research in JAMA Psychiatry shows teenage girls using birth control pills experience more depressive symptoms like crying, oversleeping, and eating issues—symptoms often labeled as "major depressive disorder."

A study in the American Journal of Psychiatry, found hormonal contraception doubles suicide attempt risk and triples suicide risk, with adolescent women at highest risk. Animal studies suggest these synthetic hormones alter prefrontal cortex development—responsible for risk assessment and impulse control. Ohio State University researchers found they may "stall brain maturation" during critical developmental windows.

These medications are prescribed without adequate warnings about psychological effects. When mood disturbances emerge, they're frequently misdiagnosed as primary psychiatric conditions requiring SSRIs, rather than recognized as side effects of hormonal manipulation.

The Path Forward: Reclaiming Adolescent Resilience

The path to better adolescent mental health doesn't require new pharmaceutical breakthroughs or revolutionary treatments. It requires returning to fundamental truths about human development that we've always known but recently forgotten:

1. Emotions, even painful ones, serve meaningful purposes and contain valuable information

2. Adolescence inherently involves mood fluctuations, identity exploration, and periods of uncertainty

3. Most emotional struggles resolve naturally with time, support, and addressing underlying factors

4. Environmental factors—sleep, nutrition, movement, social connection, screen limits—profoundly impact mental health

5. Facing rather than avoiding challenges builds essential resilience for lifelong wellbeing

6. Hormonal contraceptives can significantly impact mood regulation and brain development during adolescence, with resulting symptoms frequently misdiagnosed as clinical depression and inappropriately treated with SSRIs

By honoring these principles in our approach to adolescent distress, we can support teenagers through this critical developmental period without unnecessarily pathologizing their experiences or exposing them to pharmaceutical risks that may fundamentally alter their development.

The greatest gift we can offer struggling adolescents isn't chemical alteration but attentive presence—creating acceptance for their emotions, helping them identify underlying needs, teaching practical coping skills, and demonstrating unwavering confidence in their innate capacity for growth and resilience.

If your teen is currently taking an SSRI, do not discontinue it without medical supervision. Withdrawal effects can be serious and require careful management.

We welcome you to share your thoughts on this piece in the comments below. Click here to view our comment section moderation policy.

The opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of the Foundation Against Intolerance & Racism or its employees.

In keeping with our mission to promote a common culture of fairness, understanding, and humanity, we are committed to including a diversity of voices and encouraging compassionate and good-faith discourse.

We are actively seeking other perspectives on this topic and others. If you’d like to join the conversation, please send drafts to submissions@fairforall.org.