Is there any more sinister euphemism than "gender affirming care?" This so-called care when it takes the form of medical intervention is nothing less than medical malpractice.
and an an an attack on children, especially on children who do not conform to sexist stereotypes in terms of their behavior and choices. the evidence on this is cle…
Is there any more sinister euphemism than "gender affirming care?" This so-called care when it takes the form of medical intervention is nothing less than medical malpractice.
and an an an attack on children, especially on children who do not conform to sexist stereotypes in terms of their behavior and choices. the evidence on this is clear. read "Time to Think" by Hannah Barnes. Read the Cass Review.
It is medical care approved by the American Academy of Pediatrics, Endocrinology Society and the American Psychology Association?
The CASS paper did not provide statistics, it makes statements without analysis of the statistical significance of any outcome. It quotes papers selectively.
I have previously provided not one but 4 additional articles which outline the complex dynamics of transition for children and young adults. Where is your evidence to call care approved by medical academies “malpractice “?
As Sall Grover has written elsewhere: "I fear that anyone who has to actually be told not to sterilize children will never listen to any form of evidence against what they’re doing."
It is not, by any stretch of the imagination, the dishonest marketing euphemism "care."
It is experimental elective cosmetic drugging and surgery. That's dangerous enough to practice on adults. To practice it on minors is, indeed, medical malpractice.
Please feel free to argue this with Riittakerttu Kaltiala:
Is there any more sinister euphemism than "gender affirming care?" This so-called care when it takes the form of medical intervention is nothing less than medical malpractice.
and an an an attack on children, especially on children who do not conform to sexist stereotypes in terms of their behavior and choices. the evidence on this is clear. read "Time to Think" by Hannah Barnes. Read the Cass Review.
It is medical care approved by the American Academy of Pediatrics, Endocrinology Society and the American Psychology Association?
The CASS paper did not provide statistics, it makes statements without analysis of the statistical significance of any outcome. It quotes papers selectively.
I have previously provided not one but 4 additional articles which outline the complex dynamics of transition for children and young adults. Where is your evidence to call care approved by medical academies “malpractice “?
As Sall Grover has written elsewhere: "I fear that anyone who has to actually be told not to sterilize children will never listen to any form of evidence against what they’re doing."
It is gender-enforcing medical intervention.
It is not, by any stretch of the imagination, the dishonest marketing euphemism "care."
It is experimental elective cosmetic drugging and surgery. That's dangerous enough to practice on adults. To practice it on minors is, indeed, medical malpractice.
Please feel free to argue this with Riittakerttu Kaltiala:
https://www.thefp.com/p/gender-affirming-care-dangerous-finland-doctor