Unfair, but consistent. As you pointed out, the individual, regardless of identity category or history of oppression, is apparently too dangerous to be allowed a unique voice. Individuals think for themselves, and this "movement" requires absolute fealty.
As others have noted, it's mind boggling how comfortable people are with group-think…
Unfair, but consistent. As you pointed out, the individual, regardless of identity category or history of oppression, is apparently too dangerous to be allowed a unique voice. Individuals think for themselves, and this "movement" requires absolute fealty.
As others have noted, it's mind boggling how comfortable people are with group-think, despite the way it hamstrings their own creativity and self-expression.
Unfair, but consistent. As you pointed out, the individual, regardless of identity category or history of oppression, is apparently too dangerous to be allowed a unique voice. Individuals think for themselves, and this "movement" requires absolute fealty.
As others have noted, it's mind boggling how comfortable people are with group-think, despite the way it hamstrings their own creativity and self-expression.