The wind/whales gambit is a good example of his duplicity. He obviously doesn't care about whales -- he's just trying to cast doubt on the future of renewable energy in any way he can. This is a standard argument raised by fossil fuel interests and their lackeys.
According to NOAA "there is no scientific evidence that noise resulting from…
The wind/whales gambit is a good example of his duplicity. He obviously doesn't care about whales -- he's just trying to cast doubt on the future of renewable energy in any way he can. This is a standard argument raised by fossil fuel interests and their lackeys.
According to NOAA "there is no scientific evidence that noise resulting from offshore wind site characterization surveys could potentially cause mortality of whales. There are no known links between recent large whale mortalities and ongoing offshore wind surveys."
The wind/whales gambit is a good example of his duplicity. He obviously doesn't care about whales -- he's just trying to cast doubt on the future of renewable energy in any way he can. This is a standard argument raised by fossil fuel interests and their lackeys.
According to NOAA "there is no scientific evidence that noise resulting from offshore wind site characterization surveys could potentially cause mortality of whales. There are no known links between recent large whale mortalities and ongoing offshore wind surveys."
https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/new-england-mid-atlantic/marine-life-distress/frequent-questions-offshore-wind-and-whales