By the way, in my opinion the article linked in your message does in my opinion not address the facts and motives both Schellenberger and Lombock put forward in their well researched suggestions to deal with climate changes in the most humane and fair way possible. It reads like an aggressively attempt try to smear them and thereby de-legitimizing any claim they may possibly make.
By the way, in my opinion the article linked in your message does in my opinion not address the facts and motives both Schellenberger and Lombock put forward in their well researched suggestions to deal with climate changes in the most humane and fair way possible. It reads like an aggressively attempt try to smear them and thereby de-legitimizing any claim they may possibly make.
You're talking about Bjorn Lomborg? I hope you can do better -- he's the very definition of a partisan propagandist. As for Shellenberger, read the 3-part series I linked to for full details about his duplicity.
By the way, in my opinion the article linked in your message does in my opinion not address the facts and motives both Schellenberger and Lombock put forward in their well researched suggestions to deal with climate changes in the most humane and fair way possible. It reads like an aggressively attempt try to smear them and thereby de-legitimizing any claim they may possibly make.
You're talking about Bjorn Lomborg? I hope you can do better -- he's the very definition of a partisan propagandist. As for Shellenberger, read the 3-part series I linked to for full details about his duplicity.