But in any case, what's the point of this (false) statement? Postman contends that in the middle ages, children entered into adulthood at about the age of 9, because they had by then, being generally illiterate like their parents, been through all that adults could teach. It is certainly the case that children as young as 9 were hanged f…
But in any case, what's the point of this (false) statement? Postman contends that in the middle ages, children entered into adulthood at about the age of 9, because they had by then, being generally illiterate like their parents, been through all that adults could teach. It is certainly the case that children as young as 9 were hanged for theft in the middle ages. Is that your preferred model of child rearing, raising, and education?
But in any case, what's the point of this (false) statement? Postman contends that in the middle ages, children entered into adulthood at about the age of 9, because they had by then, being generally illiterate like their parents, been through all that adults could teach. It is certainly the case that children as young as 9 were hanged for theft in the middle ages. Is that your preferred model of child rearing, raising, and education?