Trans activists won't engage in debates on the merits of criticism of their ideology (Could it be they know they won't win?), so instead they mercilessly bully everyone they think might be waivering in their support for trans dogma. Their aim is to censor critics and sideline them.
Trans activists won't engage in debates on the merits of criticism of their ideology (Could it be they know they won't win?), so instead they mercilessly bully everyone they think might be waivering in their support for trans dogma. Their aim is to censor critics and sideline them.
Bullying and censorship are the dark side of trans-rights advocacy that progressive trans "allies" don't see or join in as wholeheartedly as if they were QAnon members trying to save babies, except in the allies' case it's so-called "trans kids."
I see a possible constellation of motivations banding together numerous different groups including political leftists and the generally concupiscent sexually abusive ringleaders who don’t think much about the political environment at all.
Leftists are on mission to destroy the institutions of marriage, family and traditional values that stem from religion. Marx himself rejected the idea that marriage should exist, so coupling would be an animal instinct and breeded children would be raised by the state’s approved professional class.
Sexual predators are all about their own sense of sexually dominating others - as they put it, “We are the champions.”
Those just wanting to live and let live are few in this. That live-and-let-live mentality does not target children like this, nope.
Thanks for sharing that article. I'm actually proud of the Times not only for refusing to acquiesce to unreasonable demands but also for defending their reporting. This in itself feels like progress, don't you think?
Signed. Sigh.
Trans activists won't engage in debates on the merits of criticism of their ideology (Could it be they know they won't win?), so instead they mercilessly bully everyone they think might be waivering in their support for trans dogma. Their aim is to censor critics and sideline them.
If you're not aware of their recent vicious and underhanded attacks on The New York Times for stepping out of line, you can read about it here: https://www.npr.org/2023/02/15/1157181127/nyt-letter-trans
Bullying and censorship are the dark side of trans-rights advocacy that progressive trans "allies" don't see or join in as wholeheartedly as if they were QAnon members trying to save babies, except in the allies' case it's so-called "trans kids."
Stalin would be proud of their zeal.
I see a possible constellation of motivations banding together numerous different groups including political leftists and the generally concupiscent sexually abusive ringleaders who don’t think much about the political environment at all.
Leftists are on mission to destroy the institutions of marriage, family and traditional values that stem from religion. Marx himself rejected the idea that marriage should exist, so coupling would be an animal instinct and breeded children would be raised by the state’s approved professional class.
Sexual predators are all about their own sense of sexually dominating others - as they put it, “We are the champions.”
Those just wanting to live and let live are few in this. That live-and-let-live mentality does not target children like this, nope.
Thanks for sharing that article. I'm actually proud of the Times not only for refusing to acquiesce to unreasonable demands but also for defending their reporting. This in itself feels like progress, don't you think?