Knowing FAIR's mission, I was actually a little excited when I saw this article's title. Would it be a thoughtful piece on how people with differing views on abortion can build bridges? The first couple of paragraphs seemed promising.
Unfortunately, paragraphs 3 and 4 made it clear the article was not worth reading. No sense spending m…
Knowing FAIR's mission, I was actually a little excited when I saw this article's title. Would it be a thoughtful piece on how people with differing views on abortion can build bridges? The first couple of paragraphs seemed promising.
Unfortunately, paragraphs 3 and 4 made it clear the article was not worth reading. No sense spending much time on an abortion law article by someone who understands neither Constitutional law nor Justice Alito's position.
But my main concern is the subject matter: What do arguments about abortion law, pro or con, have to do with FAIR's mission? Is FAIR struggling to find qualified authors with messages in line with the actual purpose of the organization?
Knowing FAIR's mission, I was actually a little excited when I saw this article's title. Would it be a thoughtful piece on how people with differing views on abortion can build bridges? The first couple of paragraphs seemed promising.
Unfortunately, paragraphs 3 and 4 made it clear the article was not worth reading. No sense spending much time on an abortion law article by someone who understands neither Constitutional law nor Justice Alito's position.
But my main concern is the subject matter: What do arguments about abortion law, pro or con, have to do with FAIR's mission? Is FAIR struggling to find qualified authors with messages in line with the actual purpose of the organization?