This author, in arguing against it, has unwittingly demonstrated the profound wisdom of the Supreme Court decision: we the people are now debating it. One issue I feel is left out of the discussion: what about the father? Does he have no responsibilities or rights?
I also question what this is doing on the FAIR substack. I cannot see …
This author, in arguing against it, has unwittingly demonstrated the profound wisdom of the Supreme Court decision: we the people are now debating it. One issue I feel is left out of the discussion: what about the father? Does he have no responsibilities or rights?
I also question what this is doing on the FAIR substack. I cannot see a connection to intolerance or racism, in the "immutable characteristic" category.
This author, in arguing against it, has unwittingly demonstrated the profound wisdom of the Supreme Court decision: we the people are now debating it. One issue I feel is left out of the discussion: what about the father? Does he have no responsibilities or rights?
I also question what this is doing on the FAIR substack. I cannot see a connection to intolerance or racism, in the "immutable characteristic" category.